She
was
dangerous
in the way
that all women
are dangerous
but she
more than most
She
was
dangerous
in the way
that all women
are dangerous
but she
more than most
The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://faithfool.wordpress.com/2007/06/21/she/trackback/
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul » | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |
Get a free blog at WordPress.com | RSS 2.0 | Comments RSS 2.0 | Theme: Quentin.
I take it the shape of the poem is intended to show the kind of danger “she” is.
Not intended. Nor was any possibility that this could come across as misogynistic (anti-feminist). Such are the risks of short, simple poems.
For a good time, insert “he” for “she” and “weak” for “dangerous.”
Thank you very much – these look great!