X-Men vs. Heroes

I’m sure this has been done to death elsewhere, but what the heck.  It hasn’t been done by me.  Now that there have been three X-Men movies, with a slew of prequels on the way, and now that the second season of Heroes is very done, I think we can step back and assess.

(*I rely both on the X-Men movies and on my reading in late 1980s/early 1990s of The Uncanny X-Men, issues #201-301; I ignore the recent Heroes spin-off comic.)

Which is better, the X-Men or the t.v. show Heroes?  Let me count the reasons.

In the X-Men‘s favor: they were first, they have solid leadership (especially under Professor X), Magneto is a compelling villian, Wolverine captures better than any other the wild side of the male soul, Storm makes a solid heir to the Professor’s throne and makes Hallie Berry look like a decent actress again, and only this franchise could pull together Patrick Stewark vs. Ian McKellan.

In Heroes‘s favor: Noah Bennett might be the most-bad-ass-dad of all time, the show has brought non-initiates (i.e., non-nerds) to the superhero table, the first season  was amazing, Hiro Nakamura  is like the best-Japanese-friend I never had, and the show is just plain fun.

To the X-Men’s discredit: the third movie was terrible, the uniforms are silly, and — maybe it’s the school — but teen angst keeps peeing on my fun-fire.

To Heroes‘s discredit: Peter Petrelli is a dumb-ass many times over, Mohinder Suresh waffles more than a bad senator, the little girl (what’s her name?) is creepy, Alejandro, and — let’s face it — much of the cast is very annoying much of the time, when you stop to think about it.  Claire!  Monica!  Nathan!  Can’t y’all get your act together?  Plus, the second season was only so-so.

What they have in common: a grasp of moral ambiguity, the importance of teamwork, and of “family” in all its forms.  Oh yeah, and good and evil mutants with superpowers.

The Verdict:  More heroes = more fun.  I’m glad we have both franchises, but, at the end of the day, I’m happy saying that Stan Lee is a genius.  Kring has yet to prove himself.  Go X-Men.

Advertisements

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://faithfool.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/x-men-vs-heroes/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

2 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. While I am not thoroughly familiar with the X-Men franchise, I did enjoy the movies a lot and watched the animated series every once in a while as a kid. I agree with your assessment that X-Men is superior to Heroes.

    However, I do have a bone to pick with you. How *dare* you group Nathan Petrelli (R.I.P?) with the other crappy characters on the show? He is one of the most complex characters! He is the only character, other than Noah Bennett, who actually has a pair. Yes, he’s been shady. Yes, he’s been selfish. But he’s non-apologetic about it, and I kinda dig that. He’s not afraid of acting like a douche, yet he shows his gentler side when needed.

    Also, you didn’t include Matt Parkman in your list of suck.

  2. Touche’. Nathan got his act together in the end. But maybe he’s not completely dead yet. (Wouldn’t be the first time.) Most of my beef lies with Peter. If he even goes through amnesia again in season three….


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: